Poems, in my opinion, are often like foggy pieces of glass. They’re put in front of us and, all too often, we don’t quite understand what we’re looking at. At times, the fog is a light mist that can be easily scrubbed away with a little bit of effort. However, it is often the case with myself that the glass is so grimy I need twenty bottles of Windex and a Sham-wow to comprehend what’s on the other side. Such was the case when I first looked at “Base Details” by Siegfried Sassoon. Like any good reader of poetry, my initial instinct was to read this out loud. It sounded like nonsense at first, but after evaluating every minute detail, as infinitesimal as they seemed, a light bulb finally began to flicker in my head!
"Base Details" by Siegfried Sassoon
IF I were fierce, and bald, and short of breath, I’d live with scarlet Majors at the Base, And speed glum heroes up the line to death. You’d see me with my puffy petulant face, Guzzling and gulping in the best hotel, 5 Reading the Roll of Honour. ‘Poor young chap,’ I’d say—‘I used to know his father well; Yes, we’ve lost heavily in this last scrap.’ And when the war is done and youth stone dead, I’d toddle safely home and die—in bed. 10
The poem starts out with some dazzling visual imagery as the speaker puts him/herself into the shoes of someone who is “fierce, and bald, and short of breath” (Sassoon 1). Who could this revolting person be? The next line left me scratching my head for a while as I learned that this mystery person had “scarlet Majors and the Base” (Sassoon 2). Just the fact that the words “majors” and “base” were capitalized led me to believe they were significant. After reading the entire piece over and over again, I began to pick up on a war/militaristic theme. This led me to infer that “scarlet Majors at the Base” was some sort of declaration of authority. Alright, well what does this speaker have against authority figures in the military? Based off of his/her negative visual imagery, we can infer as an audience that he/she is trying to get some sort of critical message across. In line five, we’re given the impression that these authority figures are pretty well off as they’re “Guzzling and gulping in the best hotel” (Sassoon 5). So, offensive number one is that this person is well off and the description of his/her “puffy petulant face” suggests that it’s in a state of gluttony (Sassoon 4). We also learn that this figure of authority “speed[s] glum heroes up the line to death” (Sassoon 3). Isn’t that a pretty picture? At this point, the author has already painted in our heads the picture of a presumably fat man/woman of power living comfortably in a fancy hotel whilst sending off brave men to fight their wars. That’s quite a statement to fit within five lines of poetry! All that’s needed now is the cherry on top, the icing on the cake. Looking at the last five lines of the poem, it is clear that the speaker is highlighting the ignorance and incompetence of this figure of power as he/she casually reads of a soldier’s death in the “Roll of Honour” as if the milkman down the street had just passed away (Sassoon 6). He/she states “‘I used to know his father well…’” and uses that as they’re only feeling of remorse towards this man’s death (Sassoon 7). To top it all off, at the end of the day, this revolting figure of power and authority would “toddle safely home and die—in bed” (Sassoon 10). As if it hadn’t already been enough, the speaker punches out that final pos t that while this man/woman hides idly behind his/her power, soldiers are dying on the front.
The title, of course, cannot be forgotten either. "Base" can be another word for dull or unimportant. Perhaps the speaker was trying to convey how leaders of the military view their thousands of soldiers. If one life was lost, is it really that much of a loss to them? Perhaps to these figures of power, it's nothing but fine print that they can easily afford to ignore.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThe opening paragraph was such an attention grabber. I related and liked the analogy you used when comparing poems to foggy glass. The overall diction you used when writing your blog post was colorful and interesting. Obviously not colorful as in inappropriate language but colorful as in a good variety of diction. The structure of your post was concise in a way that anybody reading it can easily understand your point. I agree with the poetic device you chose and how that connected to the attitude of the speaker. The use of visual imagery is portrayed as a negative attitude towards authority in war. The use of metaphors within your blog gave the post and your analysis a spark. All in all, I agree with all your key points and felt as though you answered every part to the question correctly.
ReplyDeleteI liked the way you didn't one hundred percent treat this blog post as an analytical essay; you really made it your own by adding in a little humor and your voice really shined through that. The discussion of title was great and I considered including a similar interpretation. I just wish it was developed at the beginning of your post and related to the rest of the poem throughout- it would have been great evidence for author's purpose.Nonetheless, your hook was great and many people can agree that poetry can be hard to discern with a quick reading or a glance. It was a great way to tie readers into your blog post. I liked your analysis of visual imagery and how that imagery revealed the author's message and attitude. I think the line by line interpretation and analysis worked well organizationally but it became a little overwhelming to read for me. I personally would have wanted to see more of your own words because I felt like I was getting a quotation in almost every line. I liked the use of rhetorical questions however, it lended a hand in making your writing interesting to read and conversational. Overall, you did a great job analyzing how form reveals meaning and it seems like that glass wasn't too foggy after all!
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with your analogy in the very beginning, and I love it. Most of the time, it is my foggy glasses that prevent me to read between the lines of the poem. By reading through the lines of your post, I felt like I was with you on this glass cleaning journey. Your rhetorical questions not only tie in your views toward the poems, but also your experience with the poem. One thing I overlooked from the poem is its title. Originally, I did not understand the meaning of the title. With your response, I was able to clean the last foggy glass of this poem. Furthermore, I did not fully acknowledge the visual imagery in the poem. I also like your connection to your title at the end of your response. One thing I need to learn from you is the incorporation of your own voice. Sometimes, I felt like incorporating my own voice using colloquial language is weird. However, your blog show me that voice is part of your writing style, instead of focusing on colloquial language solely. I hope you continue to clean up every foggy pieces of glass and reduce the amount of the Windex you used!
ReplyDeleteFirst and foremost, I appreciate that you understood the fact that this was still a blog post, despite the fact that it is an assignment. I completely agree with you, poetry is like a foggy piece of glass. I could look at a poem and feel one way about it, but at the same time you could look at the same poem and feel a completely different way about it. It doesn't mean that either of us are "right" or "wrong", it is just the way we see it. The rhetorical question that you used throughout your response as a great way to add a conversational feel to your post. I feel like this enabled your voice to shine through. Because of the fact that I know you personally, I felt like I was sitting with you chatting about the poem with a cup of tea (maybe I went a bit too far with the analogy). I think that you already know that I appreciate everything that you write. I can honestly picture you as a movie critic. On that note, I agree with your analysis fully. I too fully centered my response around visual imagery. I think that it is an extremely important poetic device that Sassoon purposely utilized in the poem. I think that he did this because he wanted to specifically portray his ultimate purpose to the audience. Do I need to say good job to you anymore? I think yes. Great Job!
ReplyDelete